Books read in September of 2024:
-
+= book I have read before, but not this reprint/edition/translation
Currently Reading:
"Charnel Glamour" (Mark Samuels)
The Online Journal of James Champagne
Books read in September of 2024:
-
Although a fair number of books on FRIENDS have come out over the last couple of years, Saul Austerlitz's GENERATION FRIENDS, published in 2019, is one of the better ones. Although he did not interview any of the six core cast members, he did interview the showrunners/creators David Crane and Marta Kauffman, executive producer Kevin Bright, and many of the various writers/directors/crew members/guest actors of the show, including director James Burrows, prop master Marjorie Coster-Praytor, Tate Donovan, Jessica Hecht, costume designer Debra McGuire, and many more (the writers in particular contribute a lot). At over 300 pages, it's fairly comprehensive, and is divided into four parts. Part One is 4 chapters long and covers how the show originated, the casting process (one of the most interesting chapters: Courtney Cox was of course the perfect Monica, but it's interesting to imagine an alternate universe where Janeane Garofalo, the showrunners' original choice for Monica, actually joined the show rather than turning them down, to focus instead on what by all accounts was a disastrous experience on SNL), the filming of the pilot episode, and so on. Part Two is 7 chapters long and covers seasons 1 through 3: some interesting chapters in this section include chapter 8 (which deals with how Monica's apartment and the Central Perk coffee house were designed, Rachel's iconic haircut in the early seasons, and how the characters' outfits/costumes were created), chapter 10 (which focuses on the initial contract negotiations), and chapter 11 (which captures some of what went on in the writers' room, and how certain episodes and jokes came about). Part Three is 6 chapters long and covers seasons 4 through 7, and some of its chapters focus on specific things like how the show was produced, an analysis of "The One With The Embryos" episode, an entire chapter on the Monica/Chandler relationship (while on the subject, there are no less than 6 chapters devoted to the Ross and Rachel relationship, scattered throughout the book at various points), and the "Lyle vs. Friends" lawsuit. Part Four is 8 chapters long and covers the final three seasons. Here there are chapters dealing with the controversial Joey + Rachel pairing, another chapter on the show's complex contract negotiations (which makes for very intriguing reading), a chapter on the final episode . . . meanwhile the penultimate chapter covers what the show's creators and stars got up to in the years following FRIENDS, while the last chapter explores how the show attracted a new generation of Millennial fans long after it ended (and some of whom weren't even born when it first aired), and also analyzes the show's cultural impact on pop culture (both in America and abroad).
Unlike some books in recent years that have come out on the TV show (such as Kelsey Miller's lightweight I'LL BE THERE FOR YOU), Austerlitz's book is less concerned about scoring points with the social justice crowd by griping about the show's "...deviations from contemporary liberal orthodoxy" (to quote Austerlitz's text) and more about just giving the reader a lot of behind-the-scenes information on how the show was made, so for that reason I would highly recommend this book, and it even taught me, a FRIENDS obsessive, some things about the show that I had not previously known (for example, in season 5 the writers wanted to introduce a big twist in which the whole gang would temporarily uproot and move to Minnesota). I also agree with the author's notion that, though in some ways predated by SEINFELD, FRIENDS was one of the first major sitcoms that realized that audiences had evolved and were capable of watching shows with story arcs that extended for entire seasons (a concept that some TV critics at the time seemed resistant to), and that the days of sitcoms being stand-alone shows where people tuned in for 30 minutes and quickly forgot about afterwards was in decline.
Books read in August of 2024:
-
In my first entry in this series I mentioned how, during my student days at Rhode Island College, I would often spend my breaks between classes at the campus library, browsing various books & subjects that caught my interest (such as Donald Spoto's Hitchcock study THE DARK SIDE OF GENIUS). Some subjects at that time interested me more than others, serial killers being a good example, and I liked to investigate various books related to the Manson Family and their crimes, such as Ed Sander's THE FAMILY and also HELTER SKELTER, by Vincent Bugliosi and Curt Gentry. I'm not sure where this particular interest in the Manson Family began, but it might have had something to do with the influence Manson had on the Industrial music subculture (and alternative music in general) in the 1970s and 80s. Throbbing Gristle often evoked his name (see in particular their song "After Cease to Exist"), Whitehouse and the Come Organisation made a few references to him, he was the subject of the Scraping Foetus Off The Wheel song "DI-19026," Nine Inch Nails famously recorded their THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL album in the living room where Sharon Tate and her friends were murdered, Sonic Youth had "Death Valley '69," and so on and so forth. I actually have two copies of HELTER SKELTER: a mass market paperback version from the 70s that used to belong to my mother (and which she gave to me many years ago), and this more modern updated one that I got at work awhile back: unlike many of the other books I've covered in this series, this one I actually read all the way through in linear order this year, over a month of bathroom visits (well, it IS almost 700 pages long).
Although I was very interested in the subject back in my late teens and twenties, serial killers don't really interest me all that much anymore, save for a chosen few: Jack the Ripper (perhaps the GOAT of the group), Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, Peter Sutcliffe, the Zodiac Killer (maybe), and Jeffrey Dahmer are still of interest (along with, of course, Manson and his Family), and certainly I can think of many great fictional books on the subject (Alan Moore's FROM HELL, Colin Wilson's THE GLASS CAGE, Thomas Harris' RED DRAGON, Robert Bloch's PSYCHO, Poppy Z. Brite's EXQUISITE CORPSE, David Peace's RED RIDING QUARTET, Bret Easton Ellis' AMERICAN PSYCHO, to cite a few) along with movies and TV shows (SE7EN, ZODIAC, TRUE DETECTIVE Season 1) that revolve around the subject of serial murder. Hell, I've even written a few novels on the subject myself (the most recent one being 2019's HARLEM SMOKE). Oddly enough, given my general interest in the macabre, I've actually owned/read very few True Crime books: the only ones that spring to mind are John Douglas' MINDHUNTER, Ian Brady's THE GATES OF JANUS, Dave Cullen's COLUMBINE, and, of course, the subject of today's post, HELTER SKELTER.
If True Crime books had a Holy Bible, that book would probably be HELTER SKELTER, which is, after all, the #1 True Crime bestseller of all-time (as the cover not so humbly proclaims). The most compelling murder cases are the ones where almost everything involved, even the smallest details, take on mythic dimensions, and certainly one could say that about the Tate-LaBianca murders: the American flag draped over the couch in Sharon Tate's living room (this was referenced in Bret Easton Ellis' first novel LESS THAN ZERO), the whole weird Helter Skelter race-war philosophy and the links to the "White Album" of The Beatles, the high profile nature of some of the murder victims, Spahn Ranch, and so on and so forth. Bugliosi was the prosecutor of the Tate-LaBianca trials, and thus was privy to a lot of the juicy behind-the-scenes details that must have been a subject of great fascination to the reading public of that era (the book was published in 1974, four years after the Manson trial). The book is well-structured, starting with the discovery of the bodies, the search for the killers and their eventual arrest (and if Bugliosi's book is anything to go by, the police work was often slipshod and at times reached Keystone Cops dimensions of ineptness), the investigation into the killers' motives, the trial, and the aftermath. It's also very well-written; certainly the opening sentence is iconic ("It was so quiet, one of the killers would later say, you could almost hear the sound of ice rattling in cocktail shakers in the homes way down the canyon"). And the selection of photographs is very good as well. Reading this book has kind of got me interested in the whole subject again: perhaps I should give the Ed Sanders book another glance one day.
Books read in July of 2024:
-
As
befits someone who was born in 1980, I have a long and somewhat complicated
link with the Star Wars franchise,
which I suppose could be likened to an on-again, off-again relationship (these
days, mostly off). As I believe I’ve mentioned elsewhere on this blog, the
first movie that I ever saw in theaters was Episode
VI: Return of the Jedi, back when it was released in 1983, so obviously I
was still very young at the time and, having not seen the first two movies, had
no idea what the hell was going on... all the same, it still captivated me.
Eventually I would see the first two movies as well, and Star Wars quickly became my number one obsession as a child, to the
extent that Luke Skywalker was essentially my first pop culture role model. Of
course, I read the comic adaptations, played the video and computer games, got
the action figures and toy vehicles, you name it. However, as the 80s
progressed, I started to get involved in other pop culture franchises (Masters
of the Universe, Ghostbusters, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Nintendo), and my
interest in Star Wars waned a little.
However,
it was revived around the middle of the 1990s, when I read Timothy Zahn’s
acclaimed Thrawn Trilogy novels early on in my high school era. This led me to
read many of the other “Extended Universe” Star
Wars novels and short story collections that were coming out around that
time period, like The Courtship of Princess Leia,
The Truce at Bakura, the Jedi Academy
Trilogy, Darksaber, The Crystal Star, Tales from the Mos Eisley Cantina, and so on and so forth. The Shadows of the Empire video game for the
Nintendo 64 was pretty cool as well, and I enjoyed collecting the Star Wars
Topps Finest trading cards in 1996. For some odd reason, however, I never really
got swept up in the hysteria for the Prequels: by the time of their advent I
had just embarked on my Goth phase (though can you really call something a
phase if it never ended?) and was far more interested in The Matrix, which I saw as darker and more hip. As a result, I
never actually saw The Phantom Menace in
theaters (though I did see Attack of the
Clones and Revenge of the Sith at
the time of their respective releases), and only saw bits and pieces of it over
the years at random, like when it was playing on TV. It wasn’t until 2019, when
some of my brothers and I rewatched all the Star
Wars films in chronological order, that I finally saw The Phantom Menace in its entirety, from beginning to end.
In any event, following the completion of the Prequels films in 2005, I once again kind of lost interest in the franchise, though it was briefly revived around the time of the Disney Sequels trilogy... though that flame was quickly extinguished, as not only did it annoy me that the Extended Universe novels were suddenly no longer canon, but I also found the Sequels Trilogy frenetic (and at times incoherent), utterly lacking in inspiration, creativity, and vision, a product just tossed together by hacks with no story to tell and no unifying master plan: The Force Awakens, while extremely derivative and generic, was okay as far as such things goes and at least kept my interest, but The Last Jedi is easily my least favorite Star Wars film (with Rise of Skywalker a close second). To me, the definitive Luke Skywalker will always be the one we see in Return of the Jedi, and I consider the one we see in the Sequels Trilogy an imposter (to be fair, Mark Hamill has pretty much said the same thing). Luckily, in my own head at least, I do not consider these films canon. The real shame about all this is that some of the ideas that Lucas had for a third trilogy (and which he assumed Disney would make use of when he sold Lucasfilm to them) seem really interesting, and had they been used, things might have ended up very different.
So much for the prelude. The main focus of today’s blog post is the book Secrets of the Force: The Complete, Uncensored, Unauthorized Oral History of Star Wars, by Edward Gross and Mark A. Altman. I picked up this hefty tome in the summer of 2021, when it was first published in hardcover. Like the Game of Thrones book I covered in one of the previous entries of this series, Secrets of the Force is one of those increasingly popular “oral history” books, in which a bunch of quotations by a wide variety of people are arranged in chronological order to tell a complete story of the subject in question. Of all the bathroom reads books I’ve covered so far, this one can take the longest to get through, on account of its size: 550+ pages. And while I won’t claim it’s the BEST nonfiction Star Wars book out there (that prize would go to the three “Making Of” books written by Jonathan Rinzler that exhaustively cover everything you would ever want to know about the productions of the Original Trilogy), it still does a remarkably good job of taking information from a wide spectrum of Star Wars sources and distilling it down into one comprehensive volume. The book is divided into 4 parts and 16 chapters. Part One consists of one chapter and is essentially a prologue covering not only the formative years of George Lucas but also the transition of the movie industry from the ashes of Old Hollywood to New Hollywood (and how New Hollywood was eventually superseded by the “blockbuster model” pioneered by Jaws and the first Star Wars). Part Two, the longest part of the book, is made up of 8 chapters and covers the making of the Original Trilogy, with entire chapters devoted to such subjects as the creation of the special effects, how Star Wars was marketed, the creation of the Kenner toy line... even the much maligned Holiday Special gets its own chapter. Part Three of the book is devoted to the Prequel Trilogy and is three chapters, with each Prequel film getting a chapter of its own. Part Four of the book consists of four chapters, three of which deal with the Sequel Trilogy films, while the final chapter covers Star Wars in the television medium (oddly enough, the two spin-off films, Rogue One and Solo, do not get a chapter of their own, and are dealt with in a somewhat abbreviated and cursory manner).
As previously mentioned, because this book is an oral history it is made up of a number of diverse voices of people from a whole spectrum of different fields of interests: writers/authors, pop culture commentators, podcast hosts, fan boys & fan club enthusiasts, studio executives, producers, actors, voice actors, SFX technicians, magazine editors, directors, film historians, movie critics, comic book artists, animators, journalists, toy designers, advertisers, film composers, webmasters and stuntmen. Many of the names assembled would be familiar to most Star Wars fans, not only the actors associated with the films but also a number of other voices, people like Alan Dean Foster, Ralph McQuarrie, Irvin Kershner, Richard Marquand, Timothy Zahn, Kathleen Kennedy, J.J. Abrams, Lawrence Kasdan, Dave Filoni, Frank Oz, and so on. Frustratingly, the authors of the book do not give much information as to which of the voices involved they actually interviewed, and how many of the quotes are taken from preexisting interviews, press releases, promotional appearances, and so on (though in the Acknowledgments they do confess that Lucas was not one of the people they interviewed). Some of the voices assembled are more entertaining/informative than others; for example, Samuel L. Jackson’s barely suppressed glee about being able to play a Jedi Knight and hanging out with Christopher Lee and Frank Oz is extremely infectious, and Peter Holmstrom eloquently defends Return of the Jedi (which still remains my favorite Star Wars film and also a movie I would rank in my Top Ten favorite movies of all-time), and the Prequels trilogy (although his remark that “We wouldn’t have Marvel films if it wasn’t for George Lucas” is, perhaps, the most damning accusation one could level against the series, even if the man who said it thought he was saying something positive).
In some ways, the book serves not only as a chronological history of the Star Wars saga but also as a cautionary tale about what happens when an independent franchise becomes corrupted by big business. Although commercialism and merchandising has always been an important part of Star Wars, the George Lucas Star Wars films came from a place of great vision, and their genius was in taking universal prototypes and archetypes and, in placing them in the context of an epic sci-fi space opera/intergalactic fairy tale, made what was old seem new again (I also feel that Lucas’ idea that the Star Wars universe should look “used” and “lived-in” was a great one). John Kenneth Muir hits the nail on the head here when he states (in regards to the negative initial reception of the Prequel Trilogy): “But those fans should be asked a question now: would they rather have the prequels, with their creator’s integrity and vision behind everything, or would they rather continue to see the wholesale strip-mining of the saga at the hands of a big corporation that doesn’t really understand the magic of these films?” And Ray Morton, another of the more perceptive voices interviewed in the book, sums up the failures of the Disney Sequel Trilogy succinctly: “They managed to create three movies that reasonably approximated the imagery and tone of those initial three pictures. However, they left out one crucial ingredient: the vision. What the sequel trilogy shows us is that while others may be capable of making movies that simulate the original three movies, in the end, Star Wars without George Lucas just ain’t Star Wars.”
As for the Star Wars TV shows, I have nothing to say about them because I haven’t seen them and have very little interest in doing so, especially because it seems like there are 50 of them in existence at the moment. To me, things like the books or video games or whatever notwithstanding, I’ve always seen the franchise in filmic terms, and the idea of Star Wars TV shows just doesn’t grip me (I suppose if I had to see one it would be Andor, if only because it involves one of my favorite Star Wars characters, Mon Mothma, and also because it guest stars Anton Lesser, whose work I admired in Game of Thrones). In the early 2000s I recall being annoyed that to properly appreciate the Matrix films you had to read the comics and play the video games and watch the cartoons in-between the movies, and this “fill in the gap” style of multimedia storytelling going hand-in-hand with movie releases seems to have really infected the Star Wars franchise (sadly, Game of Thrones seems to be going the same way, with a seemingly never-ending series of projected spin-offs getting announced with each passing year). Sometimes maybe the gaps SHOULDN’T be filled and things should be best left to the imagination. And I think that over the last decade some kind of saturation point has been reached; in the old days a new Star Wars thing (and especially a film) was a huge event because it was such a rare thing, but now it’s no longer a unique event or a big deal, and that's kind of sad.
On a related note, if I had to pick my Top Ten favorite Star Wars characters (outside of the core cast like Luke, Leia, Han and Vader)? #1, of course, would be Momaw Nadon, but on such a list I would also say Bossk, IG-88, Mon Mothma, Grand Admiral Thrawn, Gilad Pellaeon, Mara Jade... I’ve always had a soft spot for the Rancor as well.
Books read in June of 2024:
-